Submit nine written definitions or descriptions of philosophy and its branches.

  • Submit nine written definitions or descriptions of philosophy and its branches.

    Uploaded on: 02/05/2022

    Submit nine written definitions or descriptions of philosophy and its branches.
    Political Philosophy
    Philosophy of Mind
    Philosophy of Science.
    Each definition should be 30 words or longer. Get out there on the Internet and read about philosophy. Enjoy it. As you read and become more familiar with what philosophy is about, develop the definitions. Please write in your own words. No quoting. Number them and leave a space between each.
    After all the definitions (not after each), provide the name of at least two resources that your used to develop your definitions. Indicate which resource you thought was most helpful and explain why. Two or three sentences will be enough for this part. (Do this once, not for each definition).
    Suggested sources: Stanford Plato Encyclopedia ( and the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (

  • Document Type : docx
  • Total Pages : 2
  • Total Views : 18

Similar Essays

View Details

Submit a short essay (300 words) that addresses the following 
According to Hobbes, why do we establish societies with authorities and rules? How do fear and self-protection play a role in this?
Write it according to the following paragraph structure:
Paragraph 1 - Introduction
Paragraph 2 - Body
Paragraph 3 - Conclusion
In Paragraph 2, include a quotation from Reading 3.2, the article about Hobbes. Be sure to include an in-text citation using APA format.
At the end of the essay, include a Works Cited page. Use APA format when referencing the article.
When you quote or paraphrase, be sure to cite your source in APA format.
Be sure to use in-text citations.
Include a Works Cited page
These APA Style Guides will help

Hobbes, why do we establish societies with authorities and rules


  • Pages 2
  • Views 25
  • Views 0
View Details

Using phrenology, astrology, graphology, palmistry, numerology, ESP, or another pseudoscience (check with the instructor if unsure about whether something would fit into this discussion) as an example, describe how scientific explanations are superior to both “common sense” and “belief-based” explanations. How do the methods of authority and the rational method connect to this discussion?

Describe how scientific explanations are superior to both “common sense” and “belief-based” explanations.


  • Pages
  • Views 519
  • Views
View Details

For this assignment you will create a Socratic dialogue. The dialogue will be completed in two parts. The first part will be 1–2 pages of notes to help you generate the arguments and analysis that will become a part of your dialogue in Part II.

Part I

  1. Identify a belief. This can be a religious belief, an ethical belief, political belief, or any other one about which reasonable minds can disagree. Beliefs that are held by the vast majority of people (such as a widely accepted scientific fact) are not good choices for this assignment). A good topic will have reasonable evidence and reasoning supporting both sides.
  2. Consider other points of view, or counter-arguments. Think about what you find persuasive about these counter-arguments, as well as how you might argue against them. Try to keep an open mind. Remember, we are engaging in philosophical dialogue, not trying to win an argument.
  3. Examine the multiple points-of-view and weigh the evidence. Identify any unsupported assumptions or holes in the argument.
  4. Consider the consequences of the beliefs presented. Philosophical thinking is an ongoing process, so it is important to identify questions for further thinking and to wonder about factors and circumstances that might change your view about a particular question.

Part II

Using the analysis from Part I, write a 2-page dialogue between Socrates and a person of your choosing (i.e., the Interlocutor) that examines the belief.

  1. Have the Interlocutor present the belief and reasons you identified in step 1 of Part I.
  2. Have Socrates pose questions that encourage the Interlocutor to consider other points-of-view as well as any problems with their argument, drawing upon the multiple points-of-view you identified in steps 2 and 3 of Part I, as well as the potential consequences of a given position as identified in step 4 of Part I.
  3. Make sure your dialogue arrives at a conclusion. Keep in mind that it may be different from the belief or point of view you started with, and could be somewhat open-ended. As you searched for reasons that support your belief or point of view, you may have also come across reasons that challenge your beliefs. Don’t hide from these challenges. Remember, philosophy requires us to examine and even question our beliefs. If you find yourself more persuaded by the other points of view, don’t despair! Unlike a formal debate, the kinds of arguments we make while engaging in philosophical thinking are open to revision. 



Introduction to Philosophy: Assignment II- Create a Socratic dialogue


  • Pages
  • Views 287
  • Views
View Details

Assignment 1

  1. Read pages 36–46 from Plato's phaedo(Online Library resource). 
  2. Present a 2 -page interpretation of one of these passages in your own words. You are encouraged to cite the original text, the online lectures, and the course textbook as support for your interpretation. Remember to cite your sources (including the passage you are interpreting) in correct APA citation.
  3. Compare your interpretation to at least one of the scholarly approaches outlined in the “How to Read Platonic Dialogue” online lecture.


Introduction to Philosophy : Assignment I


  • Pages
  • Views 256
  • Views